Along CHatgpt with humans — who begin yawning in the womb just 12 weeks after conception — most other living things also yawn. That includes dogs, cats, and other mammals, but also birds, reptiles, and amphibians.
chatgpt – the best ai tool
In “Straight Talk with Rick and Jal,” Harvard University’s Jal Mehta chatgpt and I examine some of the reforms and enthusiasms that permeate education. In a field full of buzzwords and jargon, our goal is simple: Tell the truth, in plain English, about what’s being proposed and what it might mean for students, teachers, and parents. We may be wrong and will frequently disagree, but we’ll try to be candid and ensure that you don’t need a Ph.D. in eduspeak to understand us.
Today’s topic is artificial intelligence. chatgpt
— Rick chatgpt
Jal: Is artificial intelligence going to revolutionize education? Or will it go the
way of educational radio, the CD-ROM, and the many other technologies that were introduced with great fanfare but ultimately did little to change the fundamental enterprise of schooling?
Since I’m a luddite by nature, I’m going to challenge myself and start by arguing the positive case. What we’ve seen thus far, despite all the sky is falling jeremiads by newspaper columnists everywhere, is that artificial intelligence can complement but not replace quality human intelligence. ChatGPT synthesizes material from many existing online sources and integrates it into one coherent product. But if you are the one creating original thought — the writer, scholar, or student developing a piece of original work — then you have little to fear in being replaced by ChatGPT. And the more original your thinking, the less replaceable you are.
In “Straight Talk with Rick and Jal,” Harvard University’s Jal Mehta and I examine some of the reforms and enthusiasms that permeate education. In a field full of buzzwords and jargon, our goal is simple: Tell the truth, in plain English, about what’s being proposed and what it might mean for students, teachers, and parents. We may be wrong and will frequently disagree, but we’ll try to be candid and ensure that you don’t need a Ph.D. in eduspeak to understand us.
Today’s topic is artificial intelligence. chatgpt
— Rick chatgpt
Jal: Is artificial intelligence going to revolutionize education? Or will it go the way of educational radio, the CD-ROM, and the many other technologies that were introduced with great fanfare but ultimately did little to change the fundamental enterprise of schooling?
Since I’m a luddite by nature, I’m going to challenge myself and start by arguing the positive case. What we’ve seen thus far, despite all the sky is falling jeremiads by newspaper columnists everywhere, is that artificial intelligence can complement but not replace quality human intelligence. ChatGPT synthesizes material from many existing online sources and integrates it into one coherent product. But if you are the one creating original thought — the writer, scholar, or student developing a piece of original work — then you have little to fear in being replaced by ChatGPT. And the more original your thinking, the less replaceable you are.
In “Straight Talk with Rick and Jal,” Harvard University’s Jal Mehta and I examine some of the reforms and enthusiasms that permeate education. In a field full of buzzwords and jargon, our goal is simple: Tell the truth, in plain English, about what’s being proposed and what it might mean for students, teachers, and parents. We may be wrong and will frequently disagree, but we’ll try to be candid and ensure that you don’t need a Ph.D. in eduspeak to understand us.
Today’s topic is artificial intelligence. chatgpt
— Rick chatgpt
Jal: Is artificial intelligence going to revolutionize education? Or will it go the way of educational radio, the CD-ROM, and the many other technologies that were introduced with great fanfare but ultimately did little to change the fundamental enterprise of schooling? chatgpt
Since I’m a luddite by nature, I’m going to challenge myself and start by arguing the positive case. What we’ve seen thus far, despite all the sky is falling jeremiads by newspaper columnists everywhere, is that artificial intelligence can complement but not replace quality human intelligence. ChatGPT synthesizes material from many existing online sources and integrates it into one coherent product. But if you are the one creating original thought — the writer, scholar, or student developing a piece of original work — then you have little to fear in being replaced by ChatGPT. And the more original your thinking, the less replaceable you are.